Paloma Wool Relaxed Wide-Leg Pants

SKU · WV1902-135

The Paloma Wool Relaxed Wide-Leg Pants (style WV1902-135) is carried by 2 stores SoleScout tracks, priced from $215. The cheapest listing right now is $215 — $97 under the $0 retail price. 1 size is in stock somewhere right now, and the table below shows the cheapest store for each one. SoleScout doesn't sell this — we link straight to the retailer's own checkout.

About this product

Wide-leg trousers with elasticated waist Small embroidered "p-w" detail below the pocket Fine cotton with a glossy finish and a slightly transparent feel

Description supplied by a retailer carrying this product.

US Men's Sizes

1 SIZE · US

4.5

$215

More under retail in these sizes

4.5

Where to buy

2 SOURCES · CHECKED 2D AGO

Some store links are affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no cost to you. Stores are always ordered by price. Details

$215 is $97 under retail — at a hidden retailer. Unlock to see where.

2 more sources · locked· all ship from outside the US

from $215

Retailer31% OFF

1 size available · hidden retailer

$312

$215

Locked

Retailer

In stock · hidden retailer

Locked

checking your access…

Prices are each store's own retail. Links go straight to the retailer's own page.

Questions

Where can I buy the Paloma Wool Relaxed Wide-Leg Pants?

2 retailers tracked by SoleScout currently list this item, starting at $215. The "Where to buy" list shows every store's price and sizes; retailer names are unlocked with a SoleScout account.

How much does the Paloma Wool Relaxed Wide-Leg Pants cost?

Across every tracked store the price ranges from $215. Prices change daily; this page reflects the stores' own current listings.

What sizes of the Paloma Wool Relaxed Wide-Leg Pants are still available?

US sizes 4.5 are in stock at at least one tracked retailer. The per-size table shows the lowest price for each size.

What is the style code for the Paloma Wool Relaxed Wide-Leg Pants?

The manufacturer style code is WV1902-135. SoleScout matches this item across stores by style code, which is why listings that name it differently still line up.